<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The California News Service &#187; 2004</title>
	<atom:link href="http://californianewsservice.org/tag/2004/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://californianewsservice.org</link>
	<description>A Political Project by UC Berkeley&#039;s Graduate School of Journalism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Speeches or solutions?  I take speeches.</title>
		<link>http://californianewsservice.org/2008/02/21/speeches-or-solutions-i-take-speeches/</link>
		<comments>http://californianewsservice.org/2008/02/21/speeches-or-solutions-i-take-speeches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 03:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kim Geiger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Election 2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speeches]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californianewsservice.org/2008/02/21/speeches-or-solutions-i-take-speeches/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of the 2004 election, Slate’s Chris Suellentrop said it best: “Vision without details beats details without vision.”
Despite her decades of political experience and staff of campaign experts, Hillary Clinton doesn’t seem to get this.
In a speech to Ohioans yesterday, Clinton referred to herself as, “someone who’s not just in the speeches business [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the wake of the 2004 election, Slate’s Chris Suellentrop said it best: “Vision without details beats details without vision.”</p>
<p>Despite her decades of political experience and staff of campaign experts, Hillary Clinton doesn’t seem to get this.</p>
<p>In a speech to Ohioans yesterday, Clinton referred to herself as, “someone who’s not just in the speeches business – but will get America back in the solutions business.”<br />
But what about the winning elections business?</p>
<p>Barack Obama is the candidate Democrats were wishing they had in October of 2004: A person who can deliver the Democratic message without sounding more like a college professor than a leader. A candidate whose speeches are so compelling that they can distract from the Republican chest pounding, tough on terror, “I will protect you,” message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://californianewsservice.org/2008/02/21/speeches-or-solutions-i-take-speeches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

